USPTO serial 75325250
ULTIMATE DANCE PARTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2831031Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 13, 2004
- Examiner
- GLEMBOCKI, ERICA
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ULTIMATE DANCE PARTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEW YORK, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dana Breitman
DANA BREITMAN GOODWIN PROCTER599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | series of musical sound recordings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 12, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ARISTA RECORDS LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Arista Records, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Arista Records, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Arista Records, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ULTIMATE DANCE PARTY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 31, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 2, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 23, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 19, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 20, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |