Drawing for AUTHORGENICS

USPTO serial 75325330

AUTHORGENICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2442960Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 10, 2001
Examiner
CLARK, GLENN
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with AUTHORGENICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GERALD B ROSENBERG

GERALD B ROSENBERG FLIESLER DUBB MEYER & LOVEJOY LLP2225 E BAYSHORE RD STE 250PALO ALTO, CA 94303-3220UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer programs in human and machine readable form for use in computer-aided design and the computer-aided generation of other computer applications softwareSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 24, 2000
016Instructional manuals for use in computer-aided design and computer-aided generation of other computer application software and instructional manuals thereforSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 24, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 12, 2008C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Nov 22, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 10, 2001R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 8, 2001CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jan 3, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 19, 2000SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 21, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 21, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 28, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 26, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 4, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 26, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 25, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 6, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance