USPTO serial 75325485
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Pleasanton, CA
Pleasanton, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa M. Caldwell
LISA M CALDWELL KLARQUIST SPARKMAN CAMPBELL LEIGH ET ALONE WORLD TRADE CTR STE 1600121 S W SALMON STPORTLAND, OR 97204| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | skin care, beauty care and hair care preparations and cosmetics, namely, alpha-hydroxy-based skin preparations, bath gel, bath oil, blusher, body lotion, body powder, bubble bath, cellulite reducing creams, clarifier, cleansing bar, cleansing cream, cleansing gel, cleansing lotion, cologne, compacts, conditioning cleanser, coverstick, cream, deodorant, emollient, eye cream, exfoliator, face lotion, face powder, cosmetic astringents, foundation makeup, hair conditioner, hair coloring preparations, hair gel, hair lotion, hair shampoo, hair spray, hair styling preparations, lip conditioner, lip highlighter, lip liner, lipstick, makeup remover, mascara, masque, perfume, salicylic-based skin care preparations for problem skin, self tanning lotion, shaving gel, shower gel, skin balancer, skin lotion, skin and body moisturizer, skin toner, soap-free cleanser, soap-free cleansing bar, sunscreens, sun blocks, and skin patches used to determine skin type for non-medical use | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 31, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 13, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 24, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 23, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 8, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 29, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |