USPTO serial 75325522
RODEODRIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 10, 2001
- Examiner
- BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RODEODRIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NORMAN ZAFMAN
NORMAN ZAFMAN BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD FL 7LOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | credit card services rendered to merchants and their customers featuring special gifts, offers, parking and other benefits for shoppers on Rodeo Drive and the surrounding area | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 8, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 3, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |