USPTO serial 75325565
ULTRAVIEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ULTRAVIEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH E WALSH JR
JOSEPH E WALSH JR HOWELL & HAFERKAMP LC7733 FORSYTH BLVD STE 1400ST LOUIS, MO 63105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | suite of computer software for recording and processing data received from nondestructive testing equipment and for operating and monitoring said equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 17, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 10, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 24, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 17, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |