Drawing for DEY SYSTEMS, INC.

USPTO serial 75325665

DEY SYSTEMS, INC.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUNN, ELIZABETH A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DEY SYSTEMS, INC.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

AMY B BERGE

AMY B BERGE GREENEBAUM, DOLL & MCDONALD3300 NATIONAL CITY TWR101 S FIFTH STKT, LA 40202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035automated business information services, namely, providing custom integrated databases for gathering and analyzing statistical information on customer satisfaction, employee, office, and division performance, employee satisfaction, target markets, program development, training information, and to benchmark performance against internal or external groupsACTIVEJul 1, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 6, 1999ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 6, 1999OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 6, 1999OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Sep 30, 1998OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 2, 1998OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 4, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 3, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 8, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 29, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 1, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance