USPTO serial 75325837
STERICAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STERICAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ELISA M VALENZONA
ELISE M VALENZONA BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONENBC TWR455 N CITYFRONT PLZ DR STE 3600CHICAGO, IL 60611-5599Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FMC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by FMC CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by FMC CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named STERICAL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 4, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 1, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 1, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 1, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 1, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 9, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 19, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 18, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |