Drawing for HONEY CRUNCH

USPTO serial 75325854

HONEY CRUNCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARD, JENNIFER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HONEY CRUNCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN A CLIFFORD

JOHN A CLIFFORD MERCHANT GOULD SMITH EDELL WELTER ET AL3100 NORWEST CTR90 S 7TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4131

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030breakfast cerealACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 6, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 25, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 25, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 25, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 25, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 29, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 8, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 5, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 6, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 8, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance