Drawing for MERITUS

USPTO serial 75326057

MERITUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PATER, MATT
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MERITUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CYNTHIA CLARKE WEBER

2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035advertising services provided for others; promotional and marketing services for others, namely, participation in major international travel trade shows, calls and visits to airlines, travel agents, meeting and convention planners, production of brochures, flyers, and other promotional materials, and direct mailing activities; business management for others; business organization and consulting services for others; market research and evaluation services for others; all relating to hotels, motels, other temporary accommodations, restaurants, catering, and conference facilitiesACTIVE—
042hotel; resort hotels; hotel management services for others; rental of rooms; hotel concierge services; hotel services for preferred customers; housekeeping services; catering services; restaurants; cafes; snack bars; coffee bars and tea rooms; bar services; cocktail lounges; providing banquet and social function facilities for special occasions; providing facilities for conferences; health spas and saunas; providing Turkish bath facilities; massage parlors; language translation; beauty salons; hairdressing salons and services; hair styling and cutting; and barbershopsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 7, 2002EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 19, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 31, 2001EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 21, 2001EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 19, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 21, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 6, 2000EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 6, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 20, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 17, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 24, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 25, 1998ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 26, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 19, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 11, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 11, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance