USPTO serial 75326059
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
S-103 86 Stockholm, SE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT J KENNEY
ROBERT J KENNEY BIRCH STEWART KOLASCH & BIRCH LLPP O BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | products for the treatment of pressure sores on patient bodies, namely, bed mattresses, incubator mattresses, pillows, pillow shams, heel and elbow protectors, wheelchair pads and inner footsoles for medical purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | pillows, mattresses, hospital beds, and hospital bed accessories, namely, headrests, footrests, armrests; meal trays; bed casters (not of metal) and handles | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | research and development for others in medical assistance, in particular concerning discharging products for the treatment of pressure sores on patient bodies such as mattresses; wheelchair pads; heel and elbow protections; mattresses for baby incubators; pillow shams; seats and inner footsoles | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |