USPTO serial 75326565
LIPOID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2420162Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 9, 2001
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LIPOID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-67065 Ludwigshafen, DE
D-67065 Ludwigshafen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SHIFRA N. MALINA
DAVID TOREN SIDLEY AUSTIN BROWN & WOOD LLP787 7TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10019-6018UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | lecithin for use as a technological and physiological additive in the manufacture of medicines, cosmetics and beverages, said lecithin being in the nature of phosphatidyl choline, phosphatidyl ethanolamine, phosphatidy glycerol, phosphatidyl serine, phosphatidy inositol, lysophosphatidyl choline, lysophosphatidyl ethanolamine, lysophosphatidyl glycerol, phosphatidic acid, lysophosphatidic acid and compositions thereof | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 029 | lecithin for use as a technological and physiological additive for food and dietetic food, said lecithin being in the nature of phosphatidyl choline, phosphatidyl ethanolamine, phosphatidyl glycerol, phosphatidyl serine, phosphatidyl inositol, lysophosphatidyl choline, lysophosphatidyl ethanolamine, lysophosphatidyl glycerol, phosphatidic acid, lysophosphatidic acid and compositions thereof | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 21, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 18, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 18, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 25, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |