USPTO serial 75326602
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CH-8372 Ermatingen, CH
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN S REID
WELLS ST JOHN ROBERTS GREGORY & MATKIN601 W 1ST AVE STE 1300SPOKANE, WA 99204-0317| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | software, particularly for encoding and decoding data; hardware, particularly computer systems, networks, and storage systems | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | administration of online-services, development of software and hardware; information processing; information management and distribution, particularly data | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 23, 1998 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 14, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |