USPTO serial 75326775
PG&E PG&E ENERGY SERVICES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PG&E PG&E ENERGY SERVICES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LORI N BOATRIGHT
LORI N BOATRIGHT BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD 7TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | fuels, namely, natural gas | ACTIVE | Feb 3, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2002 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Mar 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 5, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 28, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 18, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 23, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 22, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 23, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |