USPTO serial 75326805
WINFACTORY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WOLFSON, FRANCES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WINFACTORY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kyoto-shi, Kyoto, JP
Kyoto-shi, Kyoto, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BARRY E BRETSCHNEIDER
BARRY E BRETSCHNEIDER MORRISON & FOERSTER2000 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006-1888UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for factory automation equipment and systems, namely, computer software for real-time control of and operation and supervision of production processes, lines and facilities; for setting and programming of control equipment; for management of production facilities and human resources in production facilities; for tracking and reporting of materials, stock and products of production processes, lines and facilities; for maintenance and fault diagnosis; for facilities monitoring and quality control; for design and verification of production lines and facilities; for programming of factory equipment; for control of computer network systems in factories, production lines and facilities; and for performance of logic programming of factory equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 10, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 29, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 10, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 4, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |