USPTO serial 75326916
MUSICNOW RECORDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MUSICNOW RECORDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KUROSH NASSERI
KUROSH NASSERI LAW OFFICE OF KUROSH NASSERI3207A M ST NW 3RD FLWASHINGTON, DC 20007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | records featuring music, but specifically excluding television broadcasting services and the publication of periodicals, namely, magazines about music and related topics | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 1, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 30, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |