Drawing for NINE ONE ONE

USPTO serial 75326947

NINE ONE ONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NINE ONE ONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cosmetics, namely, face creamACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2015CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2015COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2015CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 28, 2015COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2014COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 14, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 27, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 8, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 4, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 2, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 14, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 14, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 17, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 4, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 4, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance