USPTO serial 75328826
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK I PEROFF
MARK I PEROFF COUNSELORS OF AMERICA PC915 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10010UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | apparatus for recording, transmission or reproducing of sound or images, especially telecommunications apparatus and instruments, namely, apparatus for recording, transmission or reproducing of sound or images, wireless communication equipment, analog and digital radio transceivers for data and voice communication; telephones, mobile telephones; accessories for the aforesaid goods, especially serial cables and adapters for wireless transmission; magentic data carriers and magnetic disks containing computer programs; computers, recorded computer operating programs for use with the aforementioned goods; modems; telecopiers; parts for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | telecommunications services, namely, mobile phone services; wireless telecommunications, namely, wireless digital messaging services; collection and transmission of telecopies | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |