USPTO serial 75329183
SMARTFIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 18, 2003
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SMARTFIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TUCSON, AZ
Arizona Mail Order Company, Inc.
Tucson, AZ
ARIZONA MAIL ORDER COMPANY, INC.
TUCSON, AZ
ARIZONA MAIL ORDER COMPANY, INC.
TUCSON, AZ
ARIZONA MAIL ORDER COMPANY, INC.
TUCSON, AZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Lynn, a member of the bars of the States of California and New York
John Lynn Kirkland & Ellis LLP555 California StreetSan Francisco, CA 94104-1501UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | women's clothing, namely, pants, shorts and skirts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AMO ACQUISITION, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Arizona Mail Order Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ARIZONA MAIL ORDER COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ARIZONA MAIL ORDER COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ARIZONA MAIL ORDER COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named SMARTFIT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| May 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 6, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |