USPTO serial 75329429
MONTEREY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MONTEREY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONNA A. RUBELMANN
DONNA A RUBELMANN RUBELMANN & ASSOCIATES501 HERONDO ST STE 45HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | home furnishings, namely, tables; chairs; bookcases; cabinets; cupboards; jewelry cases not made of precious metal; furniture chests; toy chests; racks and stands for coats, hats and umbrellas; couches; sofas; curtain rods; doors for furniture; chests of drawers; figures, figurines, statues and statuettes made of wood, plastic, iron and clay; frames for mirrors and pictures; living room furniture; ottomans; furniture screens | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2002 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Feb 2, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |