USPTO serial 75329442
OPTEL COMMUNICATIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOWARD, CHERYL L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OPTEL COMMUNICATIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NEIL M ZIPKIN
NEIL M ZIPKIN AMSTER ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN90 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | telecommunications and teleconferencing equipment, namely, voice and data modems, writing tablets and computer software for use in interactive teleconferencing; private telephone systems; electronic voice mail systems, voice messaging systems; video and multimedia systems; and television cable systems all of the above systems being comprised of computers, computer circuit boards, modems, digital signal processing boards, telephone and data network switches, communications boards, logic boards, network interface boards, telephone and data transmission interface boards and circuits, power supplies and related computer software as well as instructional manuals distributed therewith | ABANDONED | Oct 29, 1982 |
| 037 | installation, maintenance and repair of telecommunications and teleconferencing systems including voice and data modems, writing tablets and computer software for use therein; and of cable television broadcasting systems and telecommunications systems, and of telephone and telephone messaging systems, voice mail and voice messaging systems | ABANDONED | Oct 29, 1982 |
| 038 | telecommunications services, namely, personal communication services, audio and video teleconferencing services and cable television broadcasting services | ABANDONED | Oct 29, 1982 |
| 042 | technical consulting and professional consulting services relating to telecommunications and telephone conferencing and computer software for use therein; providing closed circuit television security services; and technical consulting and professional consulting services relating to telephone and telephone messaging systems, voice mail and voice messaging | ABANDONED | Oct 29, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OPTEL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by OPTEL, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named OPTEL COMMUNICATIONS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 1999 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 30, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 11, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |