USPTO serial 75329824
ZEN PERFORMANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZEN PERFORMANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH DIAMANTE
JOSEPH DIAMANTE PENNIE & EDMONDS LLP1155 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | optical disc drives and parts therefor; computer software for the operation of optical disc drives; computer software which increases the performance of optical disc drives; computer software used to develop software for optical disc drives; multimedia games on optical disc; multimedia software, namely, software which arranges sound, images, text, film, animation and video for use in the creation of video games, video presentations, movies, educational and training materials; database software; indexing software; word processing software; presentation software; multimedia presentation software; multimedia authoring software; pattern recognition software; image presentation software; animation software; 2D and 3D graphics presentation software; document storage and retrieval software; image editing software; graphical editing software; spreadsheet software; global computer information network browser software; software used to access optical disc based data on commands received from a global computer information network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 10, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 29, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 26, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |