Drawing for EPROSPECTUS

USPTO serial 75330174

EPROSPECTUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RITCHIE, BRANDEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EPROSPECTUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JESS M COLLEN

SUE NAM ESQ THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE CO. OF AMERICA21ST FL751 BROAD STNEWARK, NJ 07102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036annuity underwriting and related services, namely, supplying investment and fund information via modem or through a world-wide computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 14, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 21, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 22, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 12, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 6, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 16, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 16, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 23, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 18, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance