USPTO serial 75330180
MULTIPACKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2265821Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 27, 1999
- Examiner
- WINTER, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MULTIPACKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
St. Louis, MO
St. Louis, MO
COLUMBIA, MD
HESPERIA, CA
COLUMBIA, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLAIM D. BUNCH
WILLAIM D. BUNCH 7500 GRACE DRIVE7500 Grace DriveColumbia, MD 21044UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machines for packing chromatographic columns | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 2, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MODcol Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by MODcol Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by THE SEPARATIONS GROUP
- Other trademarks owned by THE SEPARATIONS GROUP
- Other trademarks owned by ALLTECH ASSOCIATES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named MULTIPACKER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 19, 2009 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 30, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 9, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 14, 1999 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 8, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 11, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |