USPTO serial 75330216
VENTURI BY SCHOFFEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VENTURI BY SCHOFFEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
86830 Schwabmunchen, DE
86830 Schwabmunchen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK I PEROFF
MARK I PEROFF TRADEMARK & PATENT COUNSELORS OFAMERICA PC915 BROADWAY 19TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10010Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely, coats, jackets, pants, shorts, vests, shirts, pullovers, sweaters, scarves, ski pants; footwear; headwear | ABANDONED | Apr 10, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 23, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 1999 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 25, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |