Drawing for TEACH MATE

USPTO serial 75330277

TEACH MATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 608
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THAYER, GARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TEACH MATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK R LINDLEY

MARK R LINDLEY BUCKLEY LE CHEVALLIER PC5 CENTERPOINTE DR STE 250LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97035UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer softwareABANDONEDJul 10, 1996
041development and wholesale and retail sale of computer software and related products and servicesABANDONEDJul 10, 1996
042development and wholesale and retail sale of computer software and related products and servicesABANDONEDJul 10, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 23, 1999PR.DPETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED—
May 5, 1999PRIMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER MAILED—
Mar 25, 1999PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 1999PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 1999ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 23, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance