USPTO serial 75330292
HI.TECH.R
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2609997Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 20, 2002
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HI.TECH.R?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | PLASTIC PIPE SECTIONS FOR USE IN THE REPAIR OF BURIED SEWER, WATER, INDUSTRIAL, POWER AND TELEPHONE PIPELINES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 6, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 3, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 30, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 15, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |