USPTO serial 75330442
APPLOGIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with APPLOGIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Oakbrook Terrace, IL
Oakbrook Terrace, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew W. Walch
MATTHEW W WALCH LATHAM & WATKINSSEARS TWR - STE 5800233 S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for use in the fields of computer systems management, open-enterprise systems management, client/server operations, and system operations tools and utilities; database access, query and reporting, analysis, navigation, implementation, administration, conversion, migration and management; client/server and remote computing applications; backup, restoration and management of computer data and system files; programming and application development; global information network and wide area network access and development tools and utilities; graphical user interfaces and toolkits, and instructional sold as a unit therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 11, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 4, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 29, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |