Drawing for LAID-BACK LUXURY

USPTO serial 75330743

LAID-BACK LUXURY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2217078Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 12, 1999
Examiner
SPILS, CAROL A
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LAID-BACK LUXURY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042resort hotelsEXPIREDNov 1, 1994

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 15, 2009CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Feb 11, 20058.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Jan 25, 20058.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Jan 25, 2005ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 1999R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 20, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 18, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 6, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 17, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 23, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance