Drawing for REGENERATION TEMPLATE

USPTO serial 75330844

REGENERATION TEMPLATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REGENERATION TEMPLATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT S. SILVER

ROBERT S SILVER CAESAR, RIVISE, BERNSTEINCOHEN & POKOTILOW, LTD1635 MARKET ST 12TH FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2212

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010extracellular Matrix to be surgically implanted at the site of tissue which has been irreversibly damaged by accident, disease or surgery to provide conditions necessary to promote healthy cell growthACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 30, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 30, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 7, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 7, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 12, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 10, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 10, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 16, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 30, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 3, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance