USPTO serial 75330844
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT S. SILVER
ROBERT S SILVER CAESAR, RIVISE, BERNSTEINCOHEN & POKOTILOW, LTD1635 MARKET ST 12TH FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2212| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | extracellular Matrix to be surgically implanted at the site of tissue which has been irreversibly damaged by accident, disease or surgery to provide conditions necessary to promote healthy cell growth | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 12, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 16, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 30, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |