USPTO serial 75330887
TRAVELWAYS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, STACEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRAVELWAYS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Farmingdale, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JENNIFER A VAN KIRK
JENNIFER A VAN KIRK KIRKLAND & ELLIS200 E RANDOLPH DRCHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | transportation of passengers by motorcoach, namely, providing sight-seeing tours, group transportation, airline and cruise ship transfer, and special services transportation for companies and large groups | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2000 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 11, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 8, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 10, 1998 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 2, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 30, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |