Drawing for DIGISENSE

USPTO serial 75330888

DIGISENSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIGISENSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHELLE C BURKE

MICHELLE C BURKE MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY227 W MONROE STCHICAGO, IL 60606-5096UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009digital and analog modems; computer peripherals; computer hardware and software for accessing and using information available through global computer networks; software and computer programs for use on digital telephone networks in order to protect computer peripherals, digital modems, and analog modemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 30, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 10, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 25, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 16, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 26, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 29, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 28, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 28, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 20, 1999IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Jul 20, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 1, 1999ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 8, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 3, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 1, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance