USPTO serial 75331083
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Calgary, Alberta, T2H 2M8, CA
Calgary, Alberta, T2H 2M8, CA
Calgary, Alberta, T2H 2M8, CA
Calgary, Alberta, CA
THULE CHILD TRANSPORT SYSTEMS LTD.
Calgary AB, CA
Other trademarks owned by THULE CHILD TRANSPORT SYSTEMS LTD.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Monica Riva Talley
Monica Riva Talley Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.1100 New York Avenue, N.W.Washington, DC 20005UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Child carrying trailers for use in transporting children while hiking, jogging, walking, skiing, snow shoeing or skating; child strollers; bicycle trailers, namely child carrying trailers for use with bicycles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 8, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 26, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 23, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 17, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 14, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 7, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 1999 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |