USPTO serial 75331401
REBOOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOBO, DEBORAH E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REBOOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STANLEY W SOKOLOFF
STANLEY W SOKOLOFF BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD 7TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Melamine cups, bowls, tumblers, plates; vinyl placements; mini placemats; water-filled placemats; lunch boxes; snack boxes; cookie jars; foam coolers; canteens; bathroom accessories in the nature of tissue boxes, lotion pumps, cups, soap dishes, and toothbrush holders; lunch kits; insulated bottles for beverages; insulated roll-up lunch bags; lunch purses; insulated and non-insulated containers for food or beverages; sandwich boxes; insulated snack jars and kits; paper plates; plastic foam cups; paper cups; plastic cups; candle holders not of precious metal; plates; bowls; cups; spoons; forks; single and double wall acrylic drinkware; single and double wall canteens with pop-out straws; snack packs; frost mugs; sports bottles sold empty; splashies, namely, a beverage container made of molded plastic with liquid injected into its walls; and beverage sacks, namely, a bag which contains an insulated beverage container | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 16, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 6, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 4, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 3, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |