USPTO serial 75331956
MULTIMEDIA BRIDGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MULTIMEDIA BRIDGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
St. Margaret's, Twickenham TW1 1RQ, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK B HARRISON
MARK B HARRISON SPENCER & FRANK1100 NEW YORK AVE NW STE 300 EWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3955UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic apparatus and instruments and parts and fittings therefor; all for use in connection with the processing, conversion, reception or transmission of video signals; computer software for use in connection with the processing, conversion reception or transmission of video signals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 9, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 26, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |