USPTO serial 75332168
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRIAN D ANDERSON
BRIAN D ANDERSON OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER ET AL1755 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY 4TH FLARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | telecommunications and electronic communications equipment, namely, test and diagnostic modules used in network transmission systems, network switching systems, terminal or customer-provided equipment, local/wide area networks, network operations and maintenance centers, network service centers, automated test centers, test positions, and diagnostic centers; computer software for use in computer network system error recognition; computer hardware; testing equipment, namely, test modules, test panels, test sets, and computer-based multi-function tests sets; test and diagnostic systems comprised of computer hardware, namely, system master work stations, remote master controller and test units, responders, test lines, remote-controlled test units and portable test sets | ACTIVE | Jun 20, 1997 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 25, 2000 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |