Drawing for DB TELCO, INC.

USPTO serial 75332168

DB TELCO, INC.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TINGLEY, JOHN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DB TELCO, INC.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BRIAN D ANDERSON

BRIAN D ANDERSON OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER ET AL1755 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY 4TH FLARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009telecommunications and electronic communications equipment, namely, test and diagnostic modules used in network transmission systems, network switching systems, terminal or customer-provided equipment, local/wide area networks, network operations and maintenance centers, network service centers, automated test centers, test positions, and diagnostic centers; computer software for use in computer network system error recognition; computer hardware; testing equipment, namely, test modules, test panels, test sets, and computer-based multi-function tests sets; test and diagnostic systems comprised of computer hardware, namely, system master work stations, remote master controller and test units, responders, test lines, remote-controlled test units and portable test setsACTIVEJun 20, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 6, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 6, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 14, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 25, 2000EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 16, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 30, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 30, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 16, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 11, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 13, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 22, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 14, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance