CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for THE TECHNOLOGY NETWORK

USPTO serial 75332276

THE TECHNOLOGY NETWORK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2267859Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 3, 1999
Examiner
LYKOS, ANGELA
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with THE TECHNOLOGY NETWORK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Monica B. Richman

Monica B. Richman Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLPWacker Drive StationP.O. Box 061080Chicago, IL 60606-1080

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing a website of information on computer technologySECTION 8 - CANCELLEDAug 11, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 7, 2010CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Dec 5, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 23, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 30, 20058.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Sep 15, 2005PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Jul 22, 20058.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Jul 22, 2005ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 1999R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Jun 11, 1999CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Jun 11, 1999IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jun 3, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 2, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 13, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 13, 1998CNRUDISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED—
Mar 17, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 9, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 22, 1998AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 17, 1998IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance