Drawing for BLACKHAWK

USPTO serial 75332381

BLACKHAWK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLACKHAWK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN K FITZGERALD

JOHN K FITZGERALD FULWIDER PATTON LEE & UTECHT LLPHOWARD HUGHES CTR6060 CTR DR 10TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90045

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer game software; computer game discs, accessories for playing electronic computer games, namely, joysticks and instruction manuals for all the foregoing goods, sold as a unitACTIVE—
016computer game instruction manuals and strategy guidesACTIVE—
041entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 7, 2000EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 22, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 18, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
May 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 4, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 7, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 9, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 9, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance