USPTO serial 75332381
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN K FITZGERALD
JOHN K FITZGERALD FULWIDER PATTON LEE & UTECHT LLPHOWARD HUGHES CTR6060 CTR DR 10TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90045| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer game software; computer game discs, accessories for playing electronic computer games, namely, joysticks and instruction manuals for all the foregoing goods, sold as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | computer game instruction manuals and strategy guides | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer games | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 22, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 18, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 7, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |