USPTO serial 75332472
DIVERSA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 2, 1999
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DIVERSA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
Recombinant BioCatalysis, Inc.
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer Risser
Jennifer Risser Verenium Corporation4955 Directors PlaceIntellectual Property DepartmentSan Diego, CA 92121Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | bioactive molecules and enzymes for research, manufacturing, agricultural, industrial, and scientific use in the chemical, pharmaceutical, biotechnology, agricultural and food preparation fields | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DIVERSA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by DIVERSA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Recombinant BioCatalysis, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by DIVERSA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named DIVERSA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2010 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 10, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 5, 1999 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 18, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 1, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 1998 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |