Drawing for SR2000

USPTO serial 75332590

SR2000

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOWARD, CHERYL L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SR2000?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER HARDWARE, COMMUNICATIONS COMPUTERS, SERVER COMPUTERS AND MAINFRAME COMPUTERS, COMPUTER PERIPHERALSABANDONED—
042Development of data processing programs for others and rental of data processing programsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 1999ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 24, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 30, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 19981.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Jun 1, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance