USPTO serial 75332625
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID C. GRYCE
DAVID C GRYCE ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use with a global computer network, an internal computer network or an extranet, namely, software that automates document publishing, automates document searching and indexing, manages a computer network, performs office management functions, tracks the status of shipped packages and parcels, orders office supplies, locates and facilitates access to travel information, locates and provides access to telephone numbers, facsimile numbers and zip codes, facilitates and performs credit searches, provides and facilitates communications services, provides and facilitates video conferencing, facsimile, voice mail and teleconferencing functions, provides and facilitates access to e-mail, delayed e-mail and computer reminders, provides access to computer bulletin boards, chat rooms and newsgroups, facilitates and enables users to make telephone calls using a computer network, maintains and provides access to employee and human resources data and information, maintains and provides access to a company directory, maintains and provides access to payroll information, facilitates and allows users to download software from a global computer network to a personal computer, facilitates and allows users to prepare employee forms, provides access to general information, news, stock information and information about legal issues, and performs administrative and security functions | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 13, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 28, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 16, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Oct 13, 2000 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 5, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |