Drawing for PROTRACKER SYSTEM

USPTO serial 75332754

PROTRACKER SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPSON, LAVERNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROTRACKER SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK K. SURI

MARK K SURI RYNDAK & SURI LLP200 W MADISON ST STE 2100CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009database management computer software program for practice management use by attorneys, accountants, and financial plannersACTIVEMay 13, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 12, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 22, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 22, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 29, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 17, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 3, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 11, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 7, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 26, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 1, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance