Drawing for DINERJUNKIES.COM

USPTO serial 75333075

DINERJUNKIES.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 607
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MADDEN, ANNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DINERJUNKIES.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph J. Bogdan

JOSEPH J BOGDAN1223 14TH STSANTA MONICA, CA 90404UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009phonograph records and compact discs featuring musicACTIVEAug 15, 1997
035Mail order services and online ordering services by means of a global computer network featuring phonograph records and compact discsACTIVEAug 15, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2001ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Oct 11, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 11, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 13, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2000SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 8, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 24, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 24, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 5, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 13, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 11, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 9, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 29, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 23, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 24, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 1998UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance