USPTO serial 75333506
MAMA ROMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ODONOVICH, ANITA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAMA ROMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Grupo y Operadora, S.A. de C.V.
Cancun, Quintana Roo, MX
Grupo y Operadora, S.A. de C.V.
Cancun, Quintana Roo, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID A EINHORN
DAVID A EINHORN ANDERSON KILL & OLICK PC1251 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10020-1182UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Procurement services, namely, purchasing meat, vegetables, fruits, sauces, pastas, breads, tortillas used for tacos, burritos and enchiladas, alcoholic beverages and non-alcolholoic beverages for others in connection with the production of foods and beverages for consumption in businesses such as restaurants and bars | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 29, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 27, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 7, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |