USPTO serial 75333591
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Norwich, Norfolk, NR1 3JG, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID A HARLOW
DAVID A HARLOW MOORE & VAN ALLEN PLLC2200 W MAIN ST STE 800DURHAM, NC 27705UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | action figures and accessories therefore; action skill games; action toys (mechanical and electrical); children's party games; amusement park rides; animals (stuffed toy); arcade games; ball games (paddle); beach balls; Christmas tree ornaments, namely, decorated balls and animal figures; bicycles; sleds for childrens; cases for carrying dolls; children's play cosmetics; doll costumes; dolls; crib toys; dart games; board games and card games for children; doll houses; doll house furniture and furnishings; footballs and soccer balls; games and equipment sold as a unit for playing action-type targets; bows and arrows; play sets for dolls; pop-up toys; puppets; push toys; toy record players; rugby balls; playground equipment, namely, sandboxes; scuba flippers, goggles, masks and snorkels; soft sculpture plush toys; squeezable squeaking toys; children's multiply activity toys; toy vehicles; toy weapons; exercise trampolines; transforming robotic toy vehicles; wind-up toys; yo-yos | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 4, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 4, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |