Drawing for AMERICAN IPM

USPTO serial 75333713

AMERICAN IPM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENMAMAN, ALICE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMERICAN IPM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KENNETH P GLYNN

KENNETH P GLYNN GLYNN & ASSOC1 RT 12 W STE 201 (PLZ 1)FLEMINGTON, NJ 08822UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041educational services, namely, conducting seminars in the field of integrated pest managementACTIVE—
042consultating services, namely, reviewing standards and practices to assure compliance with land-grant universities' IPM program practice guidelines, as well as state governed pesticide use regulationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 12, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 3, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 3, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 17, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 17, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 22, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 29, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 7, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 7, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance