USPTO serial 75333730
VIRTUAL XP@
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIRTUAL XP@?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
St. Michael, BB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LOUIS K EBLING
LOUIS K EBLING FROST & JACOBS LLP2500 PNC CTR201 E 5TH STCINCINNATI, OH 45202-4182Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Provision of secretarial and clerical services and business consulting in remote locations accessed through the global computer network, voice, postal and facsimile communications | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Provision of translation services in remote locations accessed through the global computer network, voice, postal and facsimile communications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 1999 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 30, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |