USPTO serial 75333778
BOSS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COOPER, VANESSA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BOSS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank Chau
FRANK CHAU F CHAU & ASSOCIATES LLP1900 HEMSTEAD TPKE STE 501EAST MEADOW, NY 11554UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Power tools, namely, cutting, grinding and polishing machines and supplies, namely, blades, diamond blades, cups, wheels, discs and pads | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 16, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 16, 2000 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 20, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 20, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 5, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 5, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 5, 2000 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 19, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 21, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 24, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 4, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |