USPTO serial 75333969
TWIN POWER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TWIN POWER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL A O'NEIL
MICHAEL A O'NEIL GARDERE & WYNNE LLP1601 ELM ST STE 3000DALLAS, TX 75201-4761UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | motorcycle motor oil, sold exclusively by authorized distributors | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 1995 |
| 007 | motor parts and accessories of motorcycles, namely, oil filters, bearings, woodruff keys, shims and carb kits comprised of o-rings, jets and gaskets; short blocks, rods, cylinders, pistons, oil pumps, valves and guides, ignition coils, distributors, electronic ignitions, voltage regulators, starter motors and starter rotors, sold exclusively by authorized distributors | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 1995 |
| 012 | structural and drive train parts of motorcycles, namely, chains, transmissions gears and shafts, clutches, primary drive parts comprised of pulleys, idlers, chains and clutches; shifter assembly parts comprised of control rods and levers, mounting brackets and lever arms; transmission cases, and mechanical advance assemblies comprised of weights and springs, sold exclusively by authorized distributors | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 23, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 21, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 1, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 22, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |