USPTO serial 75333978
WOULD YOU RATHER . . . ?
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2970830Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 19, 2005
- Examiner
- PERKINS, KARLA M
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WOULD YOU RATHER . . . ??
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
Rockville, MD
Rockville, MD
Rockville, MD
NEW YORK, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Hale
John S. Hale GIPPLE & HALE6665-A Old Dominion DriveMcLean, VA 22101UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Gomberg, David
- Other trademarks owned by Gomberg, David
- Other trademarks owned by Gomberg, David
- Other trademarks owned by Heimberg, Justin
- Other trademarks owned by Heimberg, Justin
- Other trademarks owned by Heimberg, Justin
- Other trademarks owned by FALLS MEDIA LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named WOULD YOU RATHER . . . ?
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 9, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 2, 2012 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 2, 2012 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 2, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 11, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 11, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 13, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 19, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 17, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 28, 1999 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 19, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 17, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |