USPTO serial 75334105
ATLAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ATLAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES R REEVES
CHARLES R REEVES WOODARD EMHARDT NAUGHTON MORIARTY ET ALBANK 1 CTR TWR STE 3700111 MONUMENT CIRINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-5137Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | surgical cable fixation systems comprised primarily of fixation cables, plates, screws, rods, hooks and bolts used for stabilization of fractures or dislocations in the skeletal system, and instruments for implanting the same within a patient comprised primarily of cable tensioners and crimpers | ACTIVE | Jan 4, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 8, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 30, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |